View Single Post
11-08-2012, 11:37 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 16
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Replacement View Post
Wow. Silly post considering you didn't rebut any of it.

Thanks for contributing to the thread though..

Its not at all absurd. Sherritts stat is very much an artifact of the injuries on this club, lack of starting middle linebacker talent
Well for one there's your first mistake. Sherritt is the reason why Davis was not re-signed. Many people thought this was the worst move possible and a bad decision. Well, Sherritt ( in his 2nd year, first as a starter) is better than Davis.

So Bighill posts up 104 tackles, but its all about him being a beast, while Sherritt was just a product of a bad Oline ? BigHill was the first person to make contact lots of times, hence the 104 tackles. Same for Sherritt. Its not every tackle is made via a running play, numerous tackles where made when they tackles a receiver. Its the life of a LB, if the line lets the go by its his job to stop them. By your theory if Bighill was an Eskimo, he would have got 230 tackles.

Either your a massive BC /Bighill fan, or you're still mad Sherritt took Davis' spot. :p

phonyphreak is offline