Alex Galchenyuk Thread 5.0 - CLR Edition
View Single Post
11-08-2012, 06:29 PM
Join Date: Nov 2011
Originally Posted by
typo I meant had not add. what point are you trying to prove? I said he won't ever be as good as Crosby even thought he had the package to be, talent and physically wise. They both rushes the puck with power and strength, but Crosby has the edge on the understanding of the game. You seemed to agree. Is it because I think Nathan is a better player than Galchenyuk that gets you mad like this?
Well, no. Initially you said "add some vision," and then you said, "if Nathan had Crosby's vision." These are different things and what they represent, is you backing off your original point of "add some vision, and you have Crosby." You also didn't mention the understanding of the game, which is another big piece of the puzzle. Furthermore, you didn't quantify what "some vision" amounted to. Lastly, you went from not even skating, but one aspect of skating to "crosby gaiz." Essentially, what it boils down to was a silly point, even if it were true.
Last edited by overlords: 11-08-2012 at
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by NotProkofievian