2012-13 Lockout Discussion Part VI: The "What Comes Before Square One?" Edition
View Single Post
11-09-2012, 08:21 AM
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Jersey
I know people got pissed over the players not negotiating during the season. Seems like the owners needed to negotiate amongst themselves. Some teams insist on 50%, some insist on immediate drops, some demand contractual changes. Different factions have unique lines in the sand. If they were united, they might be able find their happy medium. As long as 8 teams feel shorted, there is no hockey.
To soften the drop in percentage, Boston could be insisting on stricter contracts. The players want the needle moved toward them on all fronts. Too much power to individual owners.
Last edited by DutchShamrock: 11-09-2012 at
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by DutchShamrock