Lockout discussion thread 2.0
View Single Post
11-10-2012, 12:09 AM
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brrr -18, Gomez Cold
Originally Posted by
That's such a bad idea. Eventually the offer would become beyond unreasonable and we'd be faced with cancelling a second season.
Keep doing what they're doing now and meet every day. I agree that if the players are going to move to 50-50 revenue split, they should at least be able to keep a few more of their contract bargaining rights.
The problem is the owners have to show that Fehrs tactics is causing the players money.
If the players want to give up another year of their short shelf life, then go for it. I bet they break first.
Fehrs posturing is hurting the games growth. Why would the owners offers be the same as the game gets more affected?
View Public Profile
Kirk Muller's albums
Find More Posts by Kirk Muller