View Single Post
11-10-2012, 09:17 AM
Mr. Know-It-Nothing
Join Date: Oct 2009
Country: Finland
Posts: 3,769
vCash: 500
I'm still saying that this size issue is a bit blown out of proportions. Sure, when the squad comprises of a class from one single year, they don't seem to have that much of an advantage. But why stare only at that single class, since in full-grown men there is no age limitations whatsoever?

So yeah, the 95s might be bit on the smallish side - but who cares, as long as we produce a squad or another's worth of sizable talent over several years. In the current situation, even the 94s alone are more than enough to make up the difference.

Okay, if every single one of this squad was undersized, then there might be a reason to worry because 'leap years' are never good news. But it's not like this is the case either.

Last edited by FiLe: 11-10-2012 at 09:23 AM.
FiLe is offline   Reply With Quote