Worcester Sharks / San Francisco Bulls news thread II
View Single Post
11-11-2012, 05:47 AM
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Worcester, MA
Originally Posted by
1st goal: Give away at the top of the dot for a 1 timer--no chance.
2nd goal: Unlucky bounce off a defenders skate--difficult shot to stop.
3rd goal: He should have had that one. Lazy glove.
4th goal: 3+ traffic, not an easy save but not as bad as 1 and 2. Not a bad goal to give up, especially on the PP. Momentum killer maybe, but it was a tough save.
5th goal: Beautiful pass, played it correctly, Groulx let him down.
Honestly, I don't think this was Sateri's fault--or at least the 5 goals aren't an indicator of his play. He didn't play great, but those were some really tough saves he needed to make and I don't think Stalock could have made any of those (side from goal 3--that was such a bad goal haha).
Stalock played great on Friday, was really stoked by his performance, though I wish there wasn't a game tomorrow, because I'd rather have seen him face the more high powered offense then Sateri.
We agree on 2, 3, and 5. First goal wasn't a one-timer, it was a wrist shot from just above the circles. He was completely unscreened. The 4th goal was again a long blast where while there was some traffic around he saw the puck the entire way. That's three he should have stopped.
Stalock makes the saves on 1, 3, and 4, and has a chance of stealing a save on 2.
View Public Profile
Visit 210's homepage!
Find More Posts by 210