View Single Post
11-11-2012, 01:14 PM
Mod Supervisor
TMI's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 46,142
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by thinkwild View Post
So you would like to protect Nashvilles interests by fighting for their ability to not rip up that unaffordable long term contract and re-bid on Weber in an open market place and give him a new affordable contract of the max salary for 5 years? You want to keep that long term contract because it will give Nashville a cap space advantage going forward?

And at the same time, you are arguing to eliminate those types of deals because they discriminate against teams like Nashville?
I'm not arguing anything of the sort. I was merely replying to your idea, which I already said likely wouldn't even work at all. You were saying all contracts over this hypothetical 5 year cap should be nullified, and the players should be UFAs. That would screw some teams over when they weren't the teams who actually negotiated the terms of the deals. It won't work. It's not a good idea.

TMI is offline   Reply With Quote