Should there be Revenue Sharing limits?
View Single Post
11-11-2012, 09:48 PM
Follow @ TheCyNick
Join Date: Sep 2009
Originally Posted by
Now that we have the emotional response out of the way... have you ever looked at how the
is setup? The cap is based on the
revenue. That means that whomever is at the bottom will eventually be pushed out - regardless of the team. You could have a 3 team league (Toronto, New York Rangers, Montreal), and if salaries were just based on those 3 teams, eventually NY would have to receive RS, or they'd be gone. Those lower team's revenue is actually slowing the cap's growth. Remove them (or increase their revenue) and the cap goes up.
If you want a model where no one needs RS, then ask to go back to the pre-cap days where each team could spend as much or as little as they wanted. But with a cap floor that dictates what teams MUST spend, then having RS to assist them to get to the floor is also required. Remember, Toronto, Montreal, etc all make millions each time they play these other teams.
I dont recall saying I wanted a cap system
View Public Profile
The CyNick's albums
Find More Posts by The CyNick