View Single Post
Old
11-11-2012, 11:03 PM
  #47
Riptide
Moderator
 
Riptide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Yukon
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,746
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadianHockey View Post
Disagree.

League could have solved this mostly internally. Get the biggest franchises to pay significantly more into the revenue sharing pot.

Instead, the league (fairly understandably) wanted to maximize their shares of revenues by putting the onus on the players to contribute significantly.
Mostly internally? So what would they have needed from the PA?

However asking the NHL to foot the entire bill, would amount to something like a 50% tax (or more) on those team's profits. That's not realistic, and the league (rightly so) would never agree to it.

I have no issues with the league pumping in a bunch of RS money - in fact I think it should be closer to 20-30% instead of the 6.5% the NHL proposed. However they need some things from the PA... starting with a lower split.

__________________
"Itís not as if Donald Fehr was lying to us, several players said. Rather, itís as if he has been economical with information, these players believe, not sharing facts these players consider to be vital."
Riptide is offline