View Single Post
Old
11-12-2012, 12:08 AM
  #41
DAChampion
Registered User
 
DAChampion's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Country: Australia
Posts: 6,309
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kriss E View Post
For some reason people think DD has moved ahead of Plekanec in the depth chart because of one of the worst coaches we've had in a very, very long time.
Plekanec is our best center. You don't give him whoever is left. He's the one that will lead your offense and he can handle doing so versus top opposition.

There's many reason as to why we finished 28th last year. But the point was that even with this line clicking on all cylinders, we couldn't go anywhere, so what's the point of keeping it together???
I don't care if that DD line looks good, if we don't win and the rest of our offense has trouble producing (like last year), then might as well split them up and try new combinations.
Those combinations should be tried at camp.


As for the CEL, it is absolutely relevant. Plekanec would go from playing with one of the best player to ever play, burning it up together, to pair up with Moen and Prust, while watching a sophomore player who's less talented and unproven get to play with our two best wingers who also happen to be our two Power Forwards. Just how happy do you think that would make him??? Plekanec is such a great team guy, he's never complained about all this crap and always embraced whatever role he was asked to fill. But there's a limit, and it would be a huge waste of his talent. If that's the plan they have for Plekanec, might as well trade him.
Could you give a sketch of how you would construct the lines, and how you would apportion responsibilities, such as ozone starts, dzone starts, PP time, starts against weaker opposition, starts against strong opposition, etc.

DAChampion is offline   Reply With Quote