View Single Post
Old
11-12-2012, 11:15 AM
  #58
jbeck5
Registered User
 
jbeck5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 8,277
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fugu View Post
As you know, since we've talked about before, the league's solution is to let Toronto keep even more of that money, asking the players to accept what the weakest can afford. In a way, this seems like the least fair solution to all sides.

To the point here though, as others have stated, a limit on the variance from year to year obviates the need for a term cap.
Disagree with the first part. Players should accept what the owners do to remain successful. If they don't like it then they can "get out" no one is forcing them to play in the NHL.

I agree with the second part. i would prefer the 5% rule and you can sign a contract for as long as you want. That being said, the cap hit should remain after the player retires or gets sent down.

jbeck5 is offline