Bob McKenzie: NHL doesn't need max contract length
View Single Post
11-12-2012, 03:15 PM
Join Date: May 2012
Originally Posted by
-Conceded more money into revenue sharing (at the demand of the PA)
-Conceded more money put towards players in regards to upgrade in comfort, travel, lodging, secondary medical opinions, extra trainers on the road (at the demand of the PA)
The players already receive this.
-there is supposedly a list of 17 issues that the PA brought to the table regarding contracting issues and supposedly 14 of those issues have been agreed upon or made movement by the league towards the players
Maybe you should define what ZERO means because unless you're reinventing math, don't see how that adds to ZERO.
Zero means zero. All the league has done is said these are the parameters. They all involve us taking your money, and all discussions are based on how much. The league offering a 24% reduction, then a 12% and then a 8% and so on and so forth is not a concession.
A meaningful concession would be UFA eligibility or less restrictions on contract length ect, not we're willing to take slightly less of your contracts we signed a few months earlier.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by habsfanatics*