Bob McKenzie: NHL doesn't need max contract length
View Single Post
11-12-2012, 03:23 PM
Join Date: Nov 2010
Originally Posted by
Zero means zero. All the league has done is said these are the parameters. They all involve us taking your money, and all discussions are based on how much. The league offering a 24% reduction, then a 12% and then a 8% and so on and so forth is not a concession.
A meaningful concession would be UFA eligibility or less restrictions on contract length ect, not we're willing to take slightly less of your contracts we signed a few months earlier.
So when the owners are asking the players for something they don't have currently, and the players agree, it is a concession the players are making.
When the players ask the owners for something they don't currently have, and the owners agree, it is not a concession that the owners are making. It is zero concession.
So this is your logic? Well then carry on with your new world logic.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by HockeyCrazed101