View Single Post
11-12-2012, 10:27 PM
Registered User
hbk's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,782
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by HockeyCrazed101 View Post
Yes but his use of the word can't rather than need could suggest that his argument is that the league doesn't have to go to such lengths to fool proof something that can't be fool proof because people will come along and find some new and creative way of getting around it. If he had said there's no need, then I would say that he's suggesting that there aren't loopholes to be fixed. As an agent, I'm sure he probably wants those loopholes kept open because it's better for his clients and in turn better for himself. However, I'm just trying to give due to what the agent said rather than assume the worst and twist it into something that may not be an accurate picture of what he intended to say.

Not closing the loophole would be insane. We already know the end result if the league fails to address the current loopholes.

hbk is offline   Reply With Quote