View Single Post
11-13-2012, 02:54 AM
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Orleans
Country: United States
Posts: 4,921
vCash: 500
The sole "argument" you have in this is "direct competition."

a) Parity helps popularity, which helps the league.

b) While the league mandates the minimum salary, the real reason RS exists is because without it, the poor teams are spending 70% of HRR on players... which eliminates their TRAVEL budget, and their MARKETING budget.

Would you be okay with each team paying 10% of HRR into a league-wide "Travel and Marketing Fund" and all 30 teams taking an equal slice of that, so the RS money wasn't "paying the payrolls of direct competition" ??

KevFu is offline   Reply With Quote