Thread: Speculation: What team needs more depth?
View Single Post
11-13-2012, 06:56 AM
Advanced Stagnostic
Vipers31's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bergisch Gladbach
Country: Germany
Posts: 11,051
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Leaffan16 View Post
My 1st thought is Anaheim but they say to keep a combination of prospects and near 40 year olds in their top 6 will work. No offense but I don't see that working well enough for playoffs.
While I don't disagree entirely with the notion that the Ducks lack depth in certain areas, that comment seems wildly odd. Our three most important players in (and half of) our top-six are Getzlaf, Perry and Ryan - none of which are prospects or near-40-year-olds.

There's one 40-year old in Selanne. Koivu will be centering the third line. We're left with two spots for prospects, and in Palmieri and Holland/Bonino we do have a couple that have proven enough at all lower levels to deserve that chance.

Now, if we were to talk about what happens next year in a scenario that sees us left without Getzlaf or Perry, that's a vastly different matter.

Vipers31 is offline   Reply With Quote