View Single Post
11-13-2012, 07:48 PM
Bear of Bad News
Mod Supervisor
Bear of Bad News's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Windsor
Posts: 5,023
vCash: 663
Originally Posted by Rhiessan71 View Post
Apparently my font wasn't big enough

It's mathematically clear that year to year, AS's is only about 99% as accurate as the original and only 96% as accurate over the 9 years compiled.

Again I ask, why introduce these inaccuracies when you don't have to and you absolutely don't have to in this case!
Where did you get 99% and 96%? Making up numbers doesn't help.

Also, please define "accurate" in this case. If you're going to define how "accurate" something is, then doesn't it also make sense to define what you're trying to measure?

(I'll give you a head start. Non-adjusted goal totals measure how many times the puck went into the opposing net in official National Hockey League games. No one's disputing that - so if you think that we are, then I'd suggest going back to the start of the thread and reading from there. )

Bear of Bad News is offline   Reply With Quote