View Single Post
11-13-2012, 10:13 PM
Registered User
Crease's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,085
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Fugu View Post
The NHLPA had decided they didn't mind the terms and conditions of the old CBA, for the most part, although one might say they could be convinced that some things (like the cap massaging) hurts the players equally as it does the teams.

Thus only one party wanted to change the CBA, and usually the guys who want to change the status quo are the ones who either strike or proceed with a lockout.
Can't argue with that.

Crease is offline   Reply With Quote