View Single Post
Old
11-13-2012, 10:23 PM
  #158
pepty
Registered User
 
pepty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 10,079
vCash: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacketsinDC View Post
I'm not sure if the people here are hard-headed or NHL stooges, but the whole idea that the players are LOSING money by not signing a deal is obviously wrong even from the most superficial look at the situation. Yes, the players may come out of this season only with less total pay that if they had made a deal earlier, but the fight is about the next 10-15, 30 seasons. it is about 3-7% or whatever in lost player pay over 30+ seasons, not this season. giving up ground has a long term impact on pay beyond the contract... honestly isn't that ALMOST immediately obvious...? why do people keep vomiting up this same limp argument?
Vomiting up a limp argument does sound painful.

Do you think there is going to be a 15-30 year CBA next time around?

Do you think it is the long term interest of the players that some teams may fold because the amounts they are paying out now are not sustainable?

pepty is online now   Reply With Quote