View Single Post
11-13-2012, 11:48 PM
Clearly deranged
Freudian's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Country: Sweden
Posts: 40,596
vCash: 50
Originally Posted by Fugu View Post
Round and round we go. NHL also wants contracting issues changed, but.... putting that aside, is this an eternal maxim? Players are always better off earning X% than zero, while owners are always better offer ratcheting their share upwards since X% for the players is still greater than zero?
The bigger the pie, the more work stoppage stings for both parties.

I don't think 50/50 is unreasonable or that the owners will demand players giving up salary every CBA. The players have come from 74% to 54-57% so obviously they feel they are giving up every time but it's because of where they started from.

This year the players knew it would be 50/50, knew that 50/50 is very reasonable and they still weren't willing to work with the league to get there but had to take a fight for the sake of taking a fight.

Freudian is offline   Reply With Quote