View Single Post
11-14-2012, 07:15 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,849
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by TaketheCannoli View Post
Please explain. I'm not sure I understand your post.
You said:

The players might have chosen to strike and yet they might not have. We will never know. The League made it's choice, and I'll not pretend this was forced upon them.
So you have an issue with the league taking a preventative stance. However, when I remove context from the player's situation (as you did with the owners), you conveniently add context back into the equation and justify why the players are allowed to take a preventative position in their negotiating tactics. It's either simple or it's not. It either works both ways or it doesn't.

Ari91 is offline   Reply With Quote