View Single Post
11-14-2012, 07:21 PM
TaketheCannoli's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Country: United States
Posts: 9,551
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by HockeyCrazed101 View Post
You said:

So you have an issue with the league taking a preventative stance. However, when I remove context from the player's situation (as you did with the owners), you conveniently add context back into the equation and justify why the players are allowed to take a preventative position in their negotiating tactics. It's either simple or it's not. It either works both ways or it doesn't.
Ahhhh... I think you misunderstood my post. I wasn't removing context at all. I don't advocate "first strike" bargaining by either side.

I was saying it's in the players' best interest to understand the challenges faced by the owners and work to help them solve them.

TaketheCannoli is offline   Reply With Quote