View Single Post
11-14-2012, 09:26 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,639
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Hammer79 View Post
I think it's laughable too. The 2011 Bruins would have beaten the 2012 Kings handily. 2012 Kings were the weakest cup winning squad since the 2006 Hurricanes.

Don't forget that Kesler was playing with one arm too (torn labrum, still on IR after surgery), it wasn't just Daniel that was out for most of that first round. Those are two key forwards that were nowhere near 100% The Kings didn't play the same Canucks team that took the Bruins to 7. Take two top forwards out of the Kings line-up (say Kopitar and Brown), and they are out early. (No, Gagne isn't a top forward anymore, hasn't been for a couple of years) For those who cry 'lack of depth!', hypothetically which depth players would have replaced Kopitar and Brown?

For the Blues, a young team that over-achieved greatly during the regular season, losing your #1 Halak and #1 D-man for any stretch is devastating. Elliot had great stats in a sheltered starts behing a stingy Blues system that year, but was mediocre for the Sens. This was a much bigger loss for the Blues than Kings fans would like to admit. The Blues play a low scoring system and depend on goaltending to keep them in games, they weren't built to turn the offense on like that. What luck for Kings fans, although they are loathe to admit it.

Phoenix, really? The Coyotes in the conference final? They were only a couple points up on the 8th place Kings team. Hardly an upset there for the Kings. No wonder most posters were referring to a dull playoffs. That was the weakest WCF since Anaheim vs Minnesota in 2003.

New Jersey, the 6th place team that got taken to game 7 by a Florida franchise with goaltending problems and was just happy to be there. NJ had their own luck, drawing a Philly team that forgot how to play D after the Penguins series in the 2nd round, and got by an exhausted Rangers squad in the ECF. This was hardly a big upset either for the Kings.

First two rounds, Kings draw top seed teams, but with key injuries to their top performers. Deserves an *Asterisk. The last two, they played teams that were much weaker draws than they could have been. What if Nashville had gotten over their chemistry problems? What if NY Rangers had won the ECF? What if the Penguins hadn't imploded defensively in an emotional series against their rivals? What if Tea Party Timmy hadn't become a headcase on the Bruins? All the top offensive-minded teams were out by round 2. That's quite a bit of luck to have along the way.

A cup win is a cup win, but I'm hardly convinced that they are the favorites to repeat going into next season, whenever that ends up being.
Bruins Run:

Round 1: Face decimated 6th placed Habs team without Markov, Gorges, Pacioretty. Goes to game 7 OT.

Round 2: Face injured Flyers team without Pronger and Carter for half the series. Also, they get to face the TERRIBLE duo of an old Boucher and rookie backup Bobrovsky. This is a flyers team that lost 16 of their last 25 reg season games and went 7 games with a mediocre sabres team in the first round.

Round 3: Face the Bolts without Kubina. Bergenheim also missed games 6 & 7. Once again they face an old goalie in Roloson who stopped being on fire from the middle of round 2 vs the caps.
Goes to game 7 with a late 1-0 goal to win game

Round 4: Face DECIMATED Canucks team without Samuelsson and Hamhuis since half way of game 1. Kesler is playing on one hip, Malholtra is playing with one eye, Henrik playing on one wrist, Edler playing with broken fingers, Raymond gets injured in beginning of game 6 and misses game 7. Rome suspended for playoffs for concussing Horton for series. Luongo is a headcase.

This is by far one of the luckiest cup run in history with all the injuries of their opponents. And STILL the Bruins have 3 game 7's and have the worst cup winning record (16-9) in the HISTORY of the NHL

RapidFire is offline   Reply With Quote