View Single Post
11-15-2012, 02:20 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,173
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Ryker View Post
Because even if the most important factor wasn't hockey (which I'm not saying it wasn't), he plays good hockey.
IT WAS FOR THE MONEY. He's a good player, but he's still a sell-out, a mercenary, and in my opinion, a man without principle. Kovalev was a great player. He also happened to be lazy. Is it not possible to consider his lazyness because he was a great player?

When you have kids are you going to tell them "whenever you do something in this life, do it for the money."

Originally Posted by Ryker View Post
Because hockey is not religion, where morals are made up and people sheepishly parrot to others this is how things should be.
The only people parroting anything in this thread in the last day or so has been you and the rest of the Radulov backers.

I wonder, how many of you who are tripping over yourselves to say that Radulov is just the same as any other sell-out, will support those other sell outs with such fervor?

NotProkofievian is offline   Reply With Quote