Quote:
Originally Posted by Zippy316
The guys that were there in place of them were either just as good or slightly worse then them offensively. They also had a lot more experience, strength, two-way, size, etc, then those guys at 17. I'd rather pick a 19 year old that can give me a better all-around game rather than a 17 year who can give me a bit more offensive but I'd have to shelter him.
|
2/3rds or more of the players chosen ahead of them didn't/don't play a better all around game.