Thread: Luxury Tax?
View Single Post
Old
11-15-2012, 07:09 PM
  #20
mouser
Global Moderator
Business of Hockey
 
mouser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Mountain
Posts: 13,610
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueBaron View Post
One reason I can see for there being no luxary tax to allow teams to go over the cap is teams that did so would have lower profits and so have to contribute less in revenue sharing. If I have to choose between paying 10 Mil or whatever to the low revenue teams or being 6 or 7 mil over the cap I may as well go over the cap.
Revenue sharing contributions aren't based on profits, only revenue.

mouser is offline   Reply With Quote