View Single Post
11-15-2012, 09:21 PM
Iain Fyffe
Hockey fact-checker
Iain Fyffe's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Fredericton, NB
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,469
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Rhiessan71 View Post
No, it's not a replacement.
First off, you and countless others have repeatedly tried to say that AS's are not predictions, they are just an estimate of value.
In what formula would you replace Raw data with estimations when the formula still has equations to be done that need to run off the Raw data?
Any of them, since converting between raw stats and AS is dirt simple. It's trivial to calibrate a raw-stats-based equation to use AS instead.

Originally Posted by Rhiessan71 View Post
I have already shown that AS's have inaccuracies in them compared to the raw stats. You call them rounding errors, whatever, it doesn't matter, they're there.
So show your results with decimals, and don't remove the individual player stats when making the calculation. There, you're now using adjusted stats without these "inaccuracies". They're still adjusted stats, and have none the of (very small) inaccuracies you see.

Originally Posted by Rhiessan71 View Post
Why would anyone advocate the complete throwing away of Raw Stats if you didn't have something perfect to replace it with?
Pardon? Shouldn't the criteria for replacement be better, not necessarily perfect?

Iain Fyffe is offline   Reply With Quote