View Single Post
11-15-2012, 10:38 PM
joshjull's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamburg,NY
Country: United States
Posts: 36,840
vCash: 500
Agents, Sidney Crosby call for answers over Paul Kelly firing

Another article from 2009 on the Kelly debacle

The executive board of the NHL players union – which includes Leafs rep Matt Stajan – is on the hot seat today over the firing of executive director Paul Kelly.

While Stajan insisted yesterday that "there's no turning back" from the Aug.31 decision by the board to oust Kelly, concerns aired by sports agency CAA Sports indicates the executive committee owes the membership a proper explanation of the process. It's also believed CAA Sports will begin marshalling other agents to discuss the board's action in Kelly's ouster.

"We have had numerous discussions with our clients and other players around the league regarding the dismissal of Paul Kelly as executive director of the NHLPA," agents J.P. Barry and Pat Brisson of CAA Sports said in a statement.

Those comments were echoed by Sidney Crosby, which led to speculation yesterday that the NHLPA continues to operate amid confusion and that the potential for a rift among the membership is growing.

"I definitely want to know how things happened," Crosby told ESPN. "I am part of the union like every other player and I think we all deserve a good explanation."

The board's decision came out of a 4 a.m. vote via secret ballot, something that sparked criticism over a lack of communication with the rest of the membership.
Stajan reacted strongly to the dissent from CAA Sports, and suggestions from board member and Red Wing Chris Chelios that players in Detroit were "upset with how quickly it happened in one meeting and that they didn't have a say in it."

Stajan said it was incumbent on players to "take responsibility" in learning about the process from the 30 reps. Stajan said the Leafs players were "on board" with the process and the decision.

"You're a player rep and the players are relying on their reps to do their job," Stajan said. "If we could have all 750 players there, great, but that's hard to do. We felt a change was needed and we made it.

"You had a leader (Kelly) who came under an office review," Stajan added. "There was proof there (the office) was not functioning well, and that's on the leader. In any business, that's what can happen in situations like that (reviews). I don't know why anything else is coming out now, some guys are speculating, but that's what we decided and it was unanimous."

joshjull is offline   Reply With Quote