View Single Post
Old
11-16-2012, 02:22 PM
  #174
Interactif
Registered User
 
Interactif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North York
Country: Canada
Posts: 26,209
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFinnishKulemin View Post
Pulock really wasn't that effective the night before. So I'll go with coincidence. Plus I don't see a reason to take Pulock if we don't have to, with Phaneuf. I'll take him if he's the BPA but by my count, there are 7 or 8 players better than him at this point.

And effectively a draft year younger? Semantics really. Pulock is only 7 months younger than Rielly and has actually played more games than him, and played an identical number of seasons in the WHL. So I'm not really getting that argument.
My post subway series rankings.

1. Mackinnon
2. Jones
3. Nichushkin
4. Monahan
*5. Bartov(on video and press only)
6. Pulock
7. Shinkarov
8. Drouin

Pulock may have not been Rielly on Wed, but he was right there with Murray, Reinhart, Dumba, and Siemens.

3 of the 4 top 7 picks so he is right there with good co.

We have all winter and spring to debate this one. I love the kid and he will get better.

Interactif is offline