View Single Post
11-16-2012, 02:35 PM
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,811
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by realroadrage View Post
1) Players agreed to play under current CBA while negotiating new one
2) Current CBA, by all accounts, represented a total win for owners when negotiated and signed

How anyone can blame the players when there is no hockey is beyond me.
The previous CBA was a huge win for the players.

The only reason the players wanted to play under the old one was so they could get another free year at their overpriced salary, or to get leverage of a strike mid-season.

Whydidijoin* is offline   Reply With Quote