Everybody's talking at me; I don't hear a word they're saying (CBA/Lockout XXIX)
View Single Post
11-16-2012, 05:30 PM
There is no grunion
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Long Beach, CA
Originally Posted by
I disagree, I think those contracts were about helping the team, not helping the player. The same benefit the Flyers were looking for in cap savings applies to the Preds budget.
I don't believe the NHL or the teams have a huge problem with those deals. Gary is pissed that teams found a loophole and he wants to protect teams from making really long-term mistakes.
Of course they are to help the team - the only purpose is to circumvent the salary cap and allow more star players at a discount cap hit. As that nonsense only benefits (and have only been offered by) a small number of teams however, I think it's likely that quite a few teams want those contracts gone. Why would small market teams want to have their stars stolen by poison pill contracts?
And I think having a high cap hit (which, with the latest proposal, they are stuck with regardless of who owns the player when they retire) and a large number of uninsurable years, I'm going to say plenty of teams would be much happier with the limited year contract. Agree to disagree.
View Public Profile
Ducks DVM's albums
Find More Posts by Ducks DVM