View Single Post
Old
11-16-2012, 10:57 PM
  #414
Fugu
Administrator
HFBoards
 
Fugu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 29,973
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whydidijoin View Post
The previous CBA was a huge win for the players.

The only reason the players wanted to play under the old one was so they could get another free year at their overpriced salary, or to get leverage of a strike mid-season.
And the one prior to that was even better. In fact, with the old old CBA, they would have collectively received even more money than 57% of $3.4 billion, maybe 80% according to the arguments in 2004.

So they took a 24% pay cut. And accepted linkage of 54% of something they had to define as revenues. And a hard cap of $39 MM-- which meant a midpoint of $31 MM and floor of $23 MM!!!

This was a 'concession' of gigantic proportions.

Fugu is offline   Reply With Quote