Lockout discussion thread 2.0
View Single Post
11-18-2012, 06:45 AM
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Originally Posted by
That is not "revenue sharing". No player gives any of his money to a large pie that then gets divided by players with less of a salary. Pensions, health insurance, a minimum wage fall under the category called "working conditions", not "revenue sharing".
Please keep in mind that the NHL does have the best minimum wage in the major professional sports when next we argue about how the poor players are mistreated...
It is effectively revenue sharing, money that would otherwise go to elite players goes to scrubs, etc, alternatively, the performance of the best players guarantees a fair living for the rest.
A good analogy is how national TV contracts are split 30 ways. I.e. revenue comes in and is split in a Mon free market manner.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by DAChampion