View Single Post
Old
11-18-2012, 10:13 AM
  #47
Hawkaholic
Registered User
 
Hawkaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: London, Ont.
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,419
vCash: 500
The only reason I tend to lean towards the players more than the owners is because the owners are the ones that sign the players to these deals. They want a max of 5 years for deals....WHY? Why not just not sign players to more than 5 years? You don't need a ****ing rule in place for that. Also, teams aren't really losing money (just like the Panthers in that article) and even if they are, they are still making millions upon millions of dollars with their other companies. There is a reason they buy these teams, because they know they can actually make money, but still hide it at the same time with the way HRR is defined.

Also, if you don't want to risk losing money, DON'T BUY A ****ING TEAM.

Both are to blame, but the owners are the ones that locked the players out of the system THEY built.

Hawkaholic is online now   Reply With Quote