If Revenue Sharing had been 100% Last Year...
View Single Post
11-18-2012, 02:25 PM
Join Date: Aug 2011
Originally Posted by
The players all make different amounts of money, and the owners all make different amounts of money....
Are you proposing the owners share everything? And then the players would have to also?
Well I guess I was thinking more about percentages of revenue. Maybe its not $25 million per team, i was just loosey guestamating, but im sure each team would be profitable under 100% revenue sharing.
But your right, whats the motivation to be successful if not for profit?
My answer would be winning. The owners are very successful businessmen outside of hockey already. Perhaps the motivation should be pride in winning and putting together a great team/organization and stanley cup winner. Theres already a lot of parity in the league, so im assuming this is a strong motivating force in trying to succeed as a hockey organization.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by DancesWithWookies