View Single Post
Old
11-18-2012, 03:16 PM
  #1
Fugu
Administrator
HFBoards
 
Fugu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ϶(o)ϵ
Posts: 35,635
vCash: 500
Brooks - Union: We won't decertify [yet]

http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/more_...E93owdlNyiostL

Quote:
We’re told Don and Steve Fehr outlined three options for the players in the face of the NHL’s ongoing militancy as follows, and in no particular order: 1) Decertification; 2) Capitulation; 3) Continued negotiations in an attempt to end the owners’ lockout.

Sources report that few players expressed interest in opening Doors 1 or 2. Rather, an overwhelming number of players on the call directed union leadership to continue on the path through Door No. 3.
The article title seemed to suggest that #3 wouldn't be the preferred option?


Quote:
There was little appetite to adopt that route, though talk of decertification — which presumably would be followed by filing of antitrust action in the U.S and filings in Canada, where labor laws differ throughout the provinces — will inevitably become louder and a more acceptable option for the players if the league continues to stonewall through next month.
Interesting choice of a word, stonewalling by the league. Is that necessary to build a case towards an impasse claim?

Fugu is offline