View Single Post
11-18-2012, 04:59 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,713
vCash: 500
If No. 3 is the path they want to take, I hope they bring something a bit different to the table at least. I question anyone who would suggest that the players should capitulate to the owner's proposals as is but unless they bring something to the table, it will be the same song and dance. While they could go round and round in circles hoping that the owners will cave (and using the recent Snider article as motivation), that is a bit too risky. If there are contractual changes they are willing to eventually agree to, why not barter their consideration of some of those changes in exchange for the absolute refusal of others?

Though my theory is still that the league is holding on to ALL of the contractual issues because the players are still holding on to delinkage but again, that's nothing more than my own theory.

Ari91 is offline