Scott Stevens vs Chris Pronger
View Single Post
11-18-2012, 08:51 PM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Land of no Defense
Originally Posted by
I don't put much stock into Stevens's lack of a Norris. Stevens played in one of the most competitive era for defensemen ever. Bourque/Coffey/Leetch/MacInnis/Chelios. He was top-10 in Norris voting eleven times, compared to Pronger's seven. The '94 Norris voting between Stevens and Bourque was one of the closest ever.
I certainly wouldn't put Pronger over Brad Park, Slava Fetisov, or Mark Howe just because he has a Norris and they don't.
A Hart Trophy, yeah I'll give Pronger that. But Stevens has a Conn Smythe. So whatever.
Stevens had a higher offensive peak, a higher defensive peak, a better playoff resume (capped off with a Smythe), more post-season All-Star selections (five, Pronger has four), and captained three championship teams.
Fair enough. I mean I voted for Stevens too. But there's a legitimate argument.
We're having one right now
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Machinehead