View Single Post
Old
11-18-2012, 10:02 PM
  #811
blues10
Registered User
 
blues10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,052
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whileee View Post
I'm not sure it really matters whether Clark et al. pass a motion in favor of the Jamison lease prior to their departure from city council. I can't see the contract with Jamison being signed before the new mayor and council are sworn in, and they could overturn the deal. That's what makes this whole gambit by Skeete, Clark and other council members and Jamison to pass the lease before the new council is seated seem so futile and cynical. Perhaps they are going for a symbolic act, but it will most likely poison the water more and Jamison will need all the good will he can muster from the new mayor and council to ultimately pass a durable lease agreement. If Jamison doesn't recognize that, then he is foolish. If he does, then he is just not serious about this deal.
If he was serious about this deal wouldn't he have given up his ownership stake in the San Jose Sharks over a year ago?

GJ remains a partial proud owner of the Sharks or l'ill gary and willy d's strawman

blues10 is offline