View Single Post
11-21-2012, 08:14 AM
Registered User
PADevil3034's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 3,824
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Askel View Post
Yeah Maybe the conditional was too low. 2nd if he resigns otherwise a third.

Canucks has 3 LW better than Raymond (Sedin,Booth,Higgins) and a I dont see Raymond as a useful piece on the 4th line m especially for a team needing toughness like the Canucks.

Harrold shoots right and i hes a fine no 6-7 d-man, canucks lack depthrole d-man who can play the right side, so Harrold would be a usefull piece. If Bieksa or Tanev gets injured the Canucks have one rightside D-man in the organisation.

And yes I probably undervalue Raymond, because of his crappy year last year. But Harrold fills a need for the Canucks. Canucks mightlose the trade valuevise, but still become a better team.
And, don't forget, he's also effective as a 4th line plug winger. When Kovalchuk was injured in the playoffs, Harrold slotted in at RW on the 4th line, and was more than capable.

PADevil3034 is offline   Reply With Quote