View Single Post
Old
11-21-2012, 09:29 AM
  #6
OgieO
Registered User
 
OgieO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Halifax
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,088
vCash: 500
Fun question!

I think Z has the greatest upside, but he's probably most likely to bust. Well, maybe that's not the right way to put it... right now, he's the least certain to make it (i.e. younger).

Stone has the least physical talent, but he's a tremendous player with fantastic hockey sense. But will he have enough physical talent to make it as a 50+ point player in the NHL?

Silf has great physical talents but can he translate to the NHL style of game? I love that release and if he learns to play away from the puck a little better, he could be a 40 goal scorer (with Spezza feeding him...)

I think all three have a shot to be all stars, I really do.

But if someone put a gun to my head, I think I'd take Stone. I just have a hard time thinking he won't be a very good player in the NHL. I think the other 2 COULD be better, but I'm going with the guy I think is a sure thing to be a good NHL'er.

OgieO is offline   Reply With Quote