2012 CBA Discussion Part IV (Lockout talk here)
View Single Post
11-21-2012, 10:47 AM
Join Date: Feb 2008
Originally Posted by
1. Why negotiate the next deal when you love the current one?
3. If having a deal is a priority, then the owners are just as at fault for not agreeing to play under the old CBA, as proposed by the Union, as the Union is for not negotiating during the old one. I think most agree that either side would have been dumb to take either action.
A1 The deal was expiring.
A3 playing under the old CBA would have given the NHLPA all the power and per Fehr's typical actions would have had their own strike in mid April
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Salem13