View Single Post
Old
11-21-2012, 02:13 PM
  #392
BrooklynRangersFan
Change is good.
 
BrooklynRangersFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn of course
Country: United States
Posts: 10,871
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RangerBoy View Post
The NHLPA proposal on back diving contracts and the punishment. The NHL wanted the team to take the full cap hit if the player retires before the SPC expires.



http://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/opin...contracts.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by HatTrick Swayze View Post
This seems more than fair.
Quote:
Originally Posted by -31- View Post
I actually proposed that exact solution (if I'm reading it correctly) two summers ago as an amendment to the then-current CBA.

I can see why the NHL doesn't like it though. It:
1. Doesn't punish the existing cheaters, just the ones going forward.
2. It allows a team to cheat the cap and pay for it 5-10 years later.
Yes, that is an interesting, thoughtful, creative proposal that seems very fair. I would be 100% lauding the PA for that one.... iiiiiiif it wasn't completely meaningless.

1) does not apply against existing deals
2) only applies on deals that are 9 years or longer
3) proposed term of the CBA is 5 years

Anyone else see the problem?

Seriously, do they even have competent business people or even simply diligent attorneys review this **** before they hand it over to the other side?

BrooklynRangersFan is offline