Thread: GDT: Lockout Thread II
View Single Post
11-21-2012, 05:49 PM
Bandwagon Since 1967
Ron's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brea, California
Country: United States
Posts: 13,545
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by no name View Post
With all do respect, if the owners can't afford the players then they should not sign them with the intentions of not giving them what was agreed upon a month later. When I owned my business I made my business decisions based off what I can afford and what I projected in order for my business to grow. This is an owner versus owners issue and since they can't beat eachother they turn to those that can bail them out.
Seems to me due diligence is paramount and that the players no doubt will get a letter of credit from the team's financial institution in regard to a large-money contract.

Oh, and what happened to 7 years ago when they agreed to a new CBA and GB came out and said that from there on out owners and players are partners. It was actually him just parading his victory.
Come on, that's just rhetoric. The owners own the team and the players play for them. Even the most dense player understands that.

Ron is offline