Lockout discussion thread 2.0
View Single Post
11-21-2012, 10:08 PM
Join Date: Mar 2007
Originally Posted by
Protest the Hero
Those poor kids of the future, they'll only have millions of dollars and too many chicks to bang.
Some of you guys are pathetic with your player nut hugging. They can do no wrong in these negotiations right? Their offer today was the same thing it's always been, except worded differently.
What happens if the revenues continue to climb in the next 2 years, with maybe another Canadian team or two added, then the Canadian Dollars collapses again. Under the latest player proposal the league would have no way to protect against that.
And now you guys are suggesting physical retribution against Hamrlik because he wants to play hockey again, classy.
Who are "you guys?" Where does "chicks to bang" enter the conversation? How is the CBA meant to protect the BOG against bad management decisions? "Nut hugging?"
And yet, this post is very fun to read in angry drunk voice. Keep that venom coming (nevermind if you actually know where you mean to direct it)!
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Roulin