View Single Post
11-22-2012, 11:57 PM
Registered User
DisgruntledGoat's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,302
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by RabbinsDuck View Post
Agree with your observations but not the conclusions. It was Kurri who would have won a few Selkes, not Messier. Kurri is underrated as a two-way player, while I believe Messier is overrated (mainly b/c of his physical play).
Hmm. I agree on Kurri being underrated defensively, but I don't like him in his own zone as much as I like Messier. Kurri was good defensively in a, 'get back and cover for Gretzky' kind of way.

Was he ever used in a shutdown role? Did he ever impact games in all three zones? I'm not sure he did.

I will agree that he is exactly the kind of player who would win Selkes in the current voting climate, but I still give Messier a rather large edge regardless.

DisgruntledGoat is offline   Reply With Quote