Lockout Thread II
View Single Post
11-23-2012, 02:56 PM
Join Date: May 2009
Originally Posted by
This just reads as completely misinformed. I am assuming that in your mind then, the last lockout what Bob Goodenhow's fault as well, correct? And the lockout back in 94, also the PA's fault, right? How do you propose the players' resolve this dispute?
I think you might be misunderstanding what I am trying to imply.
Both sides are at fault.
But in my honest opinion, majority of it comes from the union's management. Unions are not what they used to be back then. It is completely different.
Am I siding with the owners and Bettman? Absolutely not. They are at fault here too.
I'm just a life long hockey fan. Without or without it, my life will continue. When it's back I will be more than happy to spend my money on the game. I love hockey and the competitive nature of the game. It's just sad that one side has to be the 'dominant' one. But in reality, the owners/Bettman are the ones with 'real' powers because they have the assets to do so.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by DaAnimal