View Single Post
11-24-2012, 06:27 PM
Registered User
Riptide's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Yukon
Country: Canada
Posts: 27,474
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Fugu View Post
Back to revenue disparity. The NHL's proposal is worse. They still want their inflationary cap range system with linkage, which once again will spiral out of control for the bottom teams. The league IGNORES revenue disparity, with the only solution they seem interested in is lowering the players' take to the affordability level of the lowest team. That the wealthiest teams pocket their gains, unfairly and against any market principle that most businesses have to deal with, but that doesn't seem to bother you one bit. There is greed here, but you cannot see the worst case of it.
And other than putting the cap floor/ceiling on a % basis, what does the PA's proposal do differently that makes it better?

I've been looking for trouble... but trouble hasn't been cooperating!
Riptide is offline   Reply With Quote