View Single Post
11-25-2012, 04:11 AM
Registered User
lazerbullet's Avatar
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Europe
Posts: 684
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Hardyvan123 View Post
well being clearly in the mix for 10 and above the pack for half of the season in 10 makes him the best over that 1 and 1/2 year stretch unless one wants to get silly even the best players are not always players of the week, it's their consistency over long periods of time that make them the best.
Evaluating season-by-season is not getting silly and in fact quite common and reasonable approach. Summer 2010 Crosby was not a consensus best player. Period.

And I really don't see a reason why one should take an average of just two seasons (1.5 to be precise). That's just cherry-picking to prove a point. If you want to talk about consistency then why not 3 or 4 seasons?

lazerbullet is offline   Reply With Quote