View Single Post
11-25-2012, 02:49 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,621
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by y2kcanucks View Post
Agreed. Offensively last season there wasn't much difference between the two. Kopitar is also much better in his own end, and plays more physical. Looking at Kopitar's playoff numbers he played consistently well in the playoffs, whereas Henrik only really had 1 good series during our run.

I take Kopitar over Henrik 10 times out of 10.

which is ppg, which is similiar to what H.sedin has been putting up for the last years.

Kopitar faced much weaker defensive pairings along the kings cup run.

Sedin faced arguably the toughest defensive pairings possible, keith-seabrook, weber-suter, chara-seidenberg.

Also the kings were much deeper on the 2nd-4th lines, which took a lot of pressure off their top line.

Kopitar is a bit bigger, and a better finisher.

H.Sedin is a much better playmaker.

Pretty close.

ahmon is offline